Showing posts with label Guns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guns. Show all posts

Thursday, April 25, 2013

As Long As We're Asking These Kinds Of Questions

You'll get these kinds of answers.

Barney Frank asks:

"I wonder how the right wing in America feels about being aligned with al-Qaeda," Frank continued.
Well, Barney, about the same as you feel about being aligned with a domestic terrorist
Family Research Council (FRC) officials released video of federal investigators questioning convicted domestic terrorist Floyd Lee Corkins II, who explained that he attacked the group’s headquarters because the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) identified them as a “hate group” due to their traditional marriage views.
“Southern Poverty Law lists anti-gay groups,” Corkins tells interrogators in the video, which FRC obtained from the FBI. “I found them online, did a little research, went to the website, stuff like that.”
The Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard reported that Corkins, who pleaded guilty to terrorism charges, said in court that he hoped to “kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-Fil-A sandwiches in victims’ faces, and kill the guard.” As Bedard explained, “the shooting occurred after an executive with Chick-Fil-A announced his support for traditional marriage, angering same-sex marriage proponents.”


In other words, its a bunch of horse hockey.

Sunday, April 21, 2013

President Obama Was Right.

And if he had done what he said we should do, he would not have suffered a humiliating defeat on Gun Control.

In his speech after Newtown he said this:
 

Can we honestly say that we're doing enough to keep our children, all of them, safe from harm?

Can we claim, as a nation, that we're all together there, letting them know they are loved and teaching them to love in return?

Can we say that we're truly doing enough to give all the children of this country the chance they deserve to live out their lives in happiness and with purpose?

I've been reflecting on this the last few days, and if we're honest with ourselves, the answer's no. We're not doing enough. And we will have to change. Since I've been president, this is the fourth time we have come together to comfort a grieving community torn apart by mass shootings, fourth time we've hugged survivors, the fourth time we've consoled the families of victims.

Emphasis is mine.

I believe him.  He's right.  We need to change the way we look at ways to prevent events  like Newtown.  The problem is, what he and the Democrats proposed wasn't anything different than what they have been proposing in one form or another for the past 50 years.  In the wake of a horrific tragedy, the President and Democrats in congress did not get creative and look for new solutions, they dusted off a 50 year old playbook and proceded to try and get something they've always wanted.  And when the People hear Democrat Senators pushing the bill, even the sponsor of the bill admit that the Legislation they say is so needed would not have prevented the crime that is the impetus for the Bill, support for it fell.

But there were clues early on that Obama was not really after an actual solution.  In the same speech referenced above he said this:

Are we prepared to say that such violence visited on our children year after year after year is somehow the price of our freedom?
When you say that you want to engage in a conversation so that you can come to an agreement to solve a problem, its helpful if you don't start that conversation with an accusation that the other guy doesn't care about dead kids.

Most people are in favor of background checks, and Obama could have gotten them.  But he instead engaged in the tactic of demonizing those who he saw as opponents rather than as partners moving towards a solution.  Then he spent a good deal of time and poltical capital in pursuing a ban on magzines and so called "assault rifles."

We need to change the way we look at this problem, on that much Obama is correct on.  We need to make it more difficult for persons with serious mental illness to get guns.  That's it.  That's what6's needed.  It would pass in a heartbeat.

Monday, April 15, 2013

"Universal" Background Checks = Gun Registration After All

If you  read this post and ended up feeling all warm and cozy about the Manchin/Toomey "compromise" on background checks, you might want to grab a jacket, cuz its about to get cold.


Ace brings us a post that begins this way:

The other day I had complained that our side, collectively, is not very good at a writing legislation, and the other side is; the result is that our side tends to believe it has won a victory, misunderstanding the words in legislation, when in fact it has lost.
(Side note, those who think Rubio has engineered something that enhances Border Security, start paying attention now)

He then links to a Volokh Conspiracy post that includes this tidbit of info:

1. The provision which claims to outlaw national gun registration in fact authorizes a national gun registry.
2. The provision which is supposed to strengthen existing federal law protecting the interstate transportation of personal firearms in fact cripples that protection.
snip
The limit on creating a registry applies only to the Attorney General (and thus to entities under his direct control, such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives). By a straightforward application of inclusio unius exclusio alterius [the inclusion of one excludes others -- that is, by specifying that it is the AG that is forbidden to establish the list, it also specifies that others are not so forbidden-- ace] it is permissible for entities other than the Attorney General to create gun registries, using whatever information they can acquire from their own operations. For example, the Secretary of HHS may consolidate and centralize whatever firearms records are maintained by any medical or health insurance entity. The Secretary of the Army may consolidate and centralize records about personal guns owned by military personnel and their families.
Now we know why Obamacare has instructions to Doctors to enquire as to whether or not there is a gun in the home.
so.

Go read the post from Ace as well as that Volokh piece.

Who feels all warm and fuzzy about Rubio's "accomplishment" now?